Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:59
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Can BRICS defeat the US economically?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Rare Red Sprite Photographed in Tibet Dazzles Social Media - PetaPixel
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What is the best at home LED/red light therapy tool?
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Former Clemson DB on College Football Hall of Fame ballot - TigerNet
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sarah Michelle Gellar Wants to 'Bring Back Everyone' in the New Buffy - Variety
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Why do I sweat so much after shower?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.